Owl’s Hardware-Enforced Security Provides Reliable Protection Against Log4j Vulnerabilities

Owl’s Hardware-Enforced Security Provides Reliable Protection Against Log4j Vulnerabilities


Like thousands of other organizations, Owl Cyber Defense began reviewing the potential impact of the Log4j remote code execution vulnerability as soon as the vulnerability was announced. Our assessment produced positive news on two fronts:

  • None of the products in Owl’s commercial product line use the Apache Log4j software library, and they do not exhibit the CVE-2021-44228 vulnerability.
  • Owl’s hardware-enforced security solutions provide protection against external attacks on operational technology devices and other systems that might use Log4j.

As Owl’s official advisory on the CVE-2021-44228 vulnerability states, no action is needed with respect to any Owl product.

But as organizations conduct their own assessments of Log4j’s impact, it’s a good time to review what makes remote code execution vulnerabilities like Log4j such a severe threat, and how hardware-enforced security technology can mitigate the risks.

Threat actors are constantly seeking new ways to run their own code on other people’s computers. Most of the time, the goal is financial gain—attackers might be looking to run cryptocurrency miners on compromised computers, or run malware that exfiltrates data and credentials for sale on the black market.

But when attackers gain the ability to execute code on programmable logic controllers, SCADA devices, or other operational technology, they have the potential to change the behavior of real-world devices in power plants, oil and gas pipelines, water treatment plants, and other critical facilities.

Hardware-enforced security solutions can prevent these types of attacks by blocking external access to critical systems, even when the systems themselves have inherent vulnerabilities.

For example, if an organization uses an Owl data diode to protect its operational technology network, systems within the protected network can send log files (or other data) out to external destinations. But as data leaves the secure network, it is stripped of routing information that could identify the network, and it passes across a hardware-based one-way transfer mechanism that does not allow data to travel back into the network. This prevents threat actors from using the Log4j callback feature to gain control of computers inside the network, even if they have the CVE-2021-44228 vulnerability or other (known or unknown) vulnerabilities.

To learn more about how Owl protects critical networks and devices from remote code execution and other cyber threats, schedule a consultation with one of our experts today.

Insights to your Inbox

Stay informed with the latest cybersecurity news and resources.

Steve Stratton Author | Retired Green Beret | Cybersecurity Advisor

Operation Skipjack – Part 1

Chapter One  INDOPACOM J3 Admiral Nikki Fury  Camp H. M. Smith Aiea, Hawaii  As I’m walking back to my office in the J3-Operations Directorate, I have a feeling something is not r...
March 24, 2025
Dakota Fuller Director of Product Management

Unpacking Cross-Domain Technology: The Mechanics of Security and Efficiency

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming national security, defense, and critical industries. However, AI is only as effective as the data it processes, and flawed data can lead to da...
March 10, 2025
Data Field Anomaly Detection
Dakota Fuller Director of Product Management

Cross-Domain Solutions: The Backbone of AI Data Assurance

In today's interconnected world, managing artificial intelligence (AI)- powered systems is no longer just about harnessing computing power—it's about ensuring confidentiality, reliabili...
March 3, 2025